Conflicting Views.
But what I'm deeply puzzled about is this:
If that really is the view of GIC, then why on earth did it make those significant investments in UBS and Citigroup. If its view of the situation is so pessimistic, then wouldn't its investments be poorly timed and irrational?
This is clearly a case whereby its thoughts versus its actions are not at all cohesive.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that GIC is wrong and that all will be okay.
But I do think that this damning and pessimistic statement should not be taken so seriously.
Stumble it!