Archive for September, 2008

Death of equities?

Monday, September 29th, 2008
This is the shock I got when I opened up yahoo! finance this morning, like all morning.



I've not seen such a precipitous drop in DJ or SP500 before! STI's fall yesterday seems like child's play when compared to the big brothers over at US. I think STI might fall 6% too, so it will be around 2200. Too bad I've got work, otherwise watch the historic moment unfold.

When I came back home, I was rather shocked to learn that STI did not break 2200. In fact, it's slightly neutral at -0.1%.


What a world of difference a few hours make! Market is hard to predict indeed. STI is surprisingly strong. After going down to 2240, STI rebounded and never looked back. HSI also went from -1k to +135 intraday. Invisible hands at work here?

A little market trivia: The title of this article, "Death of equities", was published by Business Week. Then, DJ was around 800. But by the early 90s, DJ had risen over to over 3k. The rise was started around 3 months after the article was published :)

Are we at the bottom yet?

Monday, September 29th, 2008
The short answer is no, but...

1. In terms of magnitude, yes it's pretty scaring, some markets are close to 70% from the previous peak, China is down 50%, India is down 40%. But the US, where everything started, is down only 28%, and Footsie down 27%. Developed Asia-wise, STI is also quite resilient, down about 36%. Hang Seng down 46%, Japan down 37%. So magnitude wise, maybe 60%-70% done. There may be another 10-15% downside, and things should pacify. Timeline-wise, things started to unfold only last June or so. We hit 1 year anniversary not too long ago. Bear markets don't last 1 yr. Usually 2-3 yrs, so chances are, we see some rebound then returning to downward trend until fundamental gets better.

2. Fundamentals. The saying few mths ago was that the sub-prime market was US$1trn, so we have seen write-downs of US$500bn, another 50% more to go. But now, it is not just about sub-prime isn't it. The whole financial industry is in trouble. And if you look at all these bad stuff, ie mortgages, CDS, CDOs, we are talking about US$3-5trn, or even US$10trn according to mega-bears' estimates which would be 70% of US GDP!?!! So how far are we from the bottom? Man, I have no idea, but we are nowhere near the end. But then again, the whole financial industry is built on confidence, if everyone thinks that the bailout will be successful, then it doesn't really matter if we still have US$ X trn of bad stuff. Bcos the market will look past all this and start pricing in a recovery.

3. The real economy only just started to slow. US GDP dropped two quarters ago but it is still positive. China GDP growth is still 8%, may need it to go to 6% or something. Usually it takes at least 4-6 quarters before GDP growth recovers. The stock market would be 1 or 2 quarters ahead of that bcos it always looks forward. So based on this measure, recovery is at least a few quarters away.

4. We are only at the bottom when nobody is asking whether we are at the bottom. Everybody stops talking about markets. Maybe this blog gets updated once a year. And this blogger writes about restaurants or cars or girls or something totally not related to investment. And none of our friends are in finance bcos those those that wanted to join freaked out, and those that were in finance got fired or their co. blew up. Think Lehman, Washington Mutual, AIG, Northern Rock!

Conclusion: it is not clear yet if this is the bottom, a lot of conflicting info pointing to different outcomes, my guess is that we are not quite there yet. One thing sure is that this uncertainty will continue. So brace yourselves for more volatility in the markets!
Investment advice, CFA tuition, stock analysis, value investing, financial statement, financial ratios, earnings drivers, SWOT analysis, secular trends, stock screens

Brief overview of local banks

Sunday, September 28th, 2008
Is it time to buy local banks now? Someone wanted to invest a substantial amount of money into OCBC, so I thought I would do a little research to see whether it makes sense. I do not really know how to valuate banks and will not attempt to do so here. Rather, I'll just dig into the past number and let the reader do the rest of the legwork, if they are interested.

My source for these information comes from Shares Investment book (340 issue) and the respective banks' website.

Here is the brief overview of their segmented business data. It shows the revenue incurred from various segments as a percentage of the FY07's revenue.


We can see that OCBC derived a substantial portion of their revenue from dividend and rental. I suppose that rental means they have, under their holdings, certain properties. DBS has more percentage in terms of interest income and fees/commission. UOB is quite similar to DBS in that aspect, though I'm curious to know what constitutes the 'others'.

Below shows the ratios that I've done for the three local banks from FY03 to FY07. Do pay attention to the * portion below each table, as I noted the assumptions I made when calculating the figures.


Based on annualised 1H08 earnings for the three banks, at current closing of OCBC @ 7.160, DBS @ 16.920 and UOB @ 16.800, the forward PE for FY08 (estimated) and Price/Book are:

Banks-----------PE------------P/B
OCBC ----------10.7-----------1.6
DBS ------------10.2-----------1.3
UOB ----------- 11.2-----------1.6

I've browsed through the Singapore Country Book prepared by Deutsche Bank around May 2008. They mentioned that OCBC and DBS are well positioned to benefit from double digit loan growth and a rising net interest margin environment. The report seems quite bullish about the loan growth, saying that it is expected to be the second strongest year after Asian crisis. I've nothing much to comment about this, since I'm not in the know. They did cite factors such as strongth growth in business lending (particularly building and construction, property area) and in housing loans (particularly the mass to mid-market private residential, and HDB) as catalyst to push up the loans growth in the local banks.

This is for future reference:

OCBC


DBS


UOB


So which provides the most value? Price is often illusory, because the cheapest in price need not be the cheapest in value. Need to do more research.

China milk - tainted milk scandal

Thursday, September 25th, 2008
I read an interesting company update by DMG and partners regarding China milk. While I can't reproduce the entire report by cutting and pasting, I'll summarise the pertinent points here.

What happened


The whole story begins when recently, it was detected that the milk made in China have traces of melamine. A lot of babies in China, after taking in contaminated milk, had fallen ill and some had even died because of the toxicity. While most cases are contained in China itself, there are reports of one baby who suffered in HK. Despite this, a lot of countries had decided to ban china products outright for fear of further contamination. In Singapore, several products had been taken off the shelves too.


What is melamine


Melamine is a compound that is used in making plastics or fertilizers. It is a non-protein nitrogen containing compound, with about 66% nitrogen by mass and is known by it chemical name as 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine. Due to its high nitrogen content and its cheap cost, it is added to milk by farmer and/or companies to boost the nitrogen content of the raw milk so as to pass the protein test, which is used as an indicator that the raw milk supplied is of high quality.

Melamine can cause bladder and reproductive damages, specifically in the formation of kidney stones. The lethal dose of melamine is more than 3 g per kg of body mass. As such, most if not all the affected victims are babies, as their body mass are much lower than adults and hence the ingested amount, over a prolonged period of time, causes the above mentioned effects.


Possible causes of the addition of melamine to milk


China milk's management mentioned that the main reason why Chinese dairy farmers and companies add melamine is because of the poorer quality of raw milk. As the rising cost of animal feed and fertilizers increases (also linked to the rising price of crude oil) in 2008, the cattles are not fed as well as they should. The consequence of this malnutrition is that the milk produced by these cattles are also of poor quality - that is, of lower nitrogen content. In order for farmers and dairy companies to attain higher profit and margins, they need to send the raw milk supplied for protein test to indicate that it is of superior quality. Hence, the addition of melamine will serve this purpose.


How China milk can benefit from this


Management mentioned that earnings will be expected to remain stable because the core business of the company is not in selling milk but in selling bull semen, despite the name of the company. They mentioned the price of each straw of semen (specifically the pedigree Canadian bull semen in which they have a monopoly on) - RMB 70 per straw - and typically two straws are needed to impregnate a cow.

Since Canadian bull semen will produce cows which yield the best quality and volume of raw milk, the management believes that this will be an effective step in rebuilding China's reputation in the milk industry worldwide. China milk will stand to benefit from this process of rebuilding China's reputation. It will take 3 years from conception before a calf can be milked, so the healing process will not be short.

Furthermore, China milk grows 75% of their own feed and produces their own fertilizers, so they have the ability to control quality at each step of their value chain. Since feeds takes about 50%++ of their operating cost, they will stand to gain from their independence off the rising feed/fertilizer price.


Risks


While china milk mentioned in a separate announcement that they are not involved in the scandal, and none of their customers are listed in the affected companies mentioned in mass media, the industry wide scandal affects each and every player in it. It will take years before confidence will be regained.

It is important to note how the demand for china milk will be affected. If less domestic milk is consumed, then farmers will be less inclined to have more cows to produce milk, and the subsequent drop in demands for cow embryos and sperms will also be reduced.

JP Morgan listed china milk under high cash high debts - meaning a possibility of management's poor financial discipline.


How to benefit from this


PE of China milk is around 3x. I think one needs to do a projection of the earnings at much lower percentage than one based upon historical rates. Even if using a earnings growth of 5%, we have a PEG of 0.6. My views is that not much can go wrong, though I said it with a biased views of an investor with vested interest in it.


Addition announcement dated 26th Sept 2008


China milk posted another announcement on SGX. Here's a summary of the new announcement:

a. Management believes that the sales of raw milk are not expected to be materially affected as there is still demand from milk processor and milk product manufacturer

b. As the Group believes in the quality of its raw milk (which contain no additives) and because the shortage of good quality dairy cows in China still persists, the Group is cautiously optimistic that it will be able to continue securing orders to supply raw milk to its current customers (none of which are manufacturers of the affected milk powder brands in China).

c. In addition, the Group believes that there will not be any material adverse effect (financial or otherwise) on its other business relating to the sales of bull semen and cow embryos. Although the Group expects that there may eventually be some consolidation and/or adjustments in the milk production industry in China, the Group believes that there is still sufficient underlying consumer demand for dairy products in China. On the other hand, demand for its bull semen and cow embryos (both for breeding of dairy cattle as well as for fertilisation of dairy cows for the purposes of raw milk production) is expected to remain relatively consistent given the shortage of good quality dairy cows in China as a whole and the fact that dairy cows need to be fertilised every year in order to produce milk.

(I've seriously not thought about that before. I've always thought that the main economic moat of China milk is that it holds a substantial herd of Canadian Holstein, known for its high quality and high volume milk production, before China banned the import due to outbreak of mad cow disease. Now that they said it, it does make sense that the continued demand for sperm is due to the fact that diary farmers need to fertilize their cows every year to produce milk!)

d. The Group further believes that the demand for its bull semen and cow embryos will remain good as the Group only produces bull semen and cow embryos of Canadian pedigree.

e. Purely as a precautionary measure, the Group has sent samples of its raw milk to an independent laboratory for the relevant testing and will follow up with an announcement on the results of the tests after receipt of the same.

(I should wait for their report of the lab test. I like China milk's way of handling the crisis. How a company manages a crisis and offer words of confidence is as important as how they capitalise on the opportunity posed by the crisis.)

The sleeping dragon (and China map)

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008
Below is the map of China. As my portfolio had quite a bit of exposure to China, I think I should put in a map of the different provinces of China for future references.




These days, there are many reports by brokerage firms on S-shares. S-shares are Singapore listed China companies. As always, they have plenty of things to say about s-shares. With s-shares having superbly low PE below 10 (3 even!), there are reports saying some are value buys and some are never buys. When the bull is charging, reports of QDII funds coming delights these analyst, so target prices keeps shifting northwards. When the bear is charging, reports of possible frauds, unsustainable growth, poor governance (among other stuff) are cited to keep pushing the target prices downwards.



The table above shows some of the s-shares with warning signs. It's taken from a report from JP morgan. Surprisingly, out of so many s-shares, none of them mentioned my beloved Hongguo. Hongguo must be a pretty uninteresting company to these analyst, since not one of these big names mentioned them. I was a little perturbed when China milk had the privilege of being listed as the company with high cash, high debt. This 'indicates poor financial discipline', according to the report. 'Balance sheet management around book closure date, or in the worst case scenario, a possibility of fraud or embezzlement of cash' might be the possible reasons.

Well, it seems like chinamilk had the dubious honour of having total debt/market cap>30% and total cash/market cap>30%, hence it was identifed as having high cash, high debt. I wish to defend it, but was flabbergasted and not sure what to say. Why was I unable to defend? My confessions:

1. I did not read up much on china milk before buying.

2. I did not know the business as much as I would love to.

Forgive me, I bought one tranche in Dec 2007 and another batch in March 2008. Well, to atone myself from the sins of value investing, I promise to write a detailed report on the valuation and business of china milk, with as much detail as my Hongguo writeup. This will not only give me the confidence to hold on, but the confidence to add on when the opportunity so arises.